Type to search

US Utility to Drop Storage Batteries from Chinese Supplier CATL

Duke Energy’s change of course on the batteries could have supply chain implications – and a chilling effect on an energy storage market dominated by Chinese manufacturers

Power transmission pylon miniatures and the Duke Energy logo are seen in this Reuters file image from late 2022.


US utility company Duke Energy plans to phase out use of products from Chinese battery-maker CATL after pressure from lawmakers in Washington.

Duke said it will also decommission energy-storage batteries produced by CATL at a large Marine Corps base on the US east coast.

These decisions, which have not been previously reported, came as top US officials warned that hackers linked to the Chinese government have been targeting network-linked critical US infrastructure, such as power grids.

While the storage batteries were considered secure, there were fears that communications systems on the batteries could be vulnerable to hacking.


ALSO SEE: Nvidia Plans New Unit to Target $30bn Custom Chip Market


In December it was reported that Duke temporarily disconnected industrial-scale CATL storage batteries from a project at the Camp Lejeune Marine Corps base in North Carolina after lawmakers and experts raised concern about the battery supplier’s close links to China’s ruling Communist Party.

The permanent shutdown of the batteries, less than a year after a ribbon cutting that involved US military brass, is the latest example of how strategic competition between the United States and China is affecting US and Chinese businesses – sometimes in dramatic ways.


Battery storage officials and a US Marine Corps commander are seen at Camp Lejeune after the CATL storage batteries were installed in April 2023 (Reuters).


Duke opts for domestic or allied nation supplier

Duke Energy’s change of course on the batteries could have supply chain implications for the utility and have a chilling effect on an energy storage market dominated by Chinese manufacturers.

“In partnership with policymakers and the Department of the Navy, we have made the decision to decommission the CATL battery energy storage system at Camp Lejeune and replace it with a domestic or allied nation supplier,” Duke Energy said in a statement in response to questions.

“By 2027, we are voluntarily moving away from specifying CATL battery energy storage technologies,” the statement said, adding that the company supported a “robust American supply chain.”

Duke Energy had sought to assuage concerns in Congress over possible network vulnerabilities arising from the batteries, sending at least five executives, including its chief security and information officer to meet with staff of the House of Representatives’ select committee on China in the first week of January, according to two sources familiar with the discussions.

While the Duke Energy executives told the staff that they were confident in the security of the batteries, they also expressed a desire to address congressional concerns, the sources said.

The executives disclosed in the meeting that the company had been considering CATL batteries for about two dozen other projects.

Duke Energy did not answer questions about how those projects would be affected by the decision to cut CATL from its supply chain. It did not specify what type of batteries it would use at the Camp Lejeune facility going forward.

One person familiar with the Camp Lejeune project said Duke Energy did not have direct contracts with CATL and bought the batteries through third party providers.


Avoiding Chinese batteries could limit supply

Mike Gallagher, the Republican chairman of the bipartisan select committee, and Senator Marco Rubio said in a statement that they were pleased Duke Energy had moved to decommission the CATL batteries at Camp Lejeune.

“Additionally, in our most recent meeting with company leadership, Duke committed to entirely phasing out CATL products from its supply chain,” the lawmakers said.

CATL, a global leader in energy storage, did not respond immediately to a request for comment. After Duke Energy first disconnected the Camp Lejeune site, the Chinese company said its batteries had passed rigorous US safety and security reviews.

The company’s battery energy storage systems (BESS) are slated to be installed at commercial projects around the country, including in Texas and near Las Vegas.

Planned and operational US utility-scale battery capacity reached around 16 GW at the end of 2023 and could nearly double to over 30 GW by the end of 2024, according to the US Energy Information Administration.

Any broad effort to avoid Chinese batteries could put utility operators in a severe supply pinch.

“Fully avoiding Chinese batteries would severely limit supply, to the point of not being able to deploy nearly enough stationary storage systems and EVs to meet demand and decarbonization goals,” Vanessa Witte, Wood Mackenzie senior research analyst for US energy storage, said.

Many in the industry say that Chinese batteries cells themselves do not present serious security concerns.

But communications systems on the batteries could be vulnerable to hacking, security experts say, allowing a potential adversary to trigger repeated surges and cuts in current to the electricity grid, causing cascading failure.

Over the last year, lawmakers have stepped up pressure to wean the US away from Chinese batteries.

A measure in this year’s annual defence spending bill bans the Defence Department from procuring batteries produced by CATL and several other top Chinese manufacturers starting in 2027.


  • Reuters with additional input and editing by Jim Pollard




US Cleared Chinese Hackers From Pacific Computer Systems


US Accuses More Chinese Tech Firms of ‘Helping Beijing’s Military’


Raimondo Says Chinese EVs Are a National Security Risk For US, EU


Another 13 Chinese Companies Added to US ‘Unverified List’


US Chip Curbs Force China’s YMTC to Look For More Funds – FT


Apple Defers Plan to Use China’s YMTC Chips – Nikkei


US to Reject ‘Untrustworthy’ New Huawei, ZTE Equipment


US Chip Ban Likely to Hit Most of China’s Tech Giants


Jim Pollard

Jim Pollard is an Australian journalist based in Thailand since 1999. He worked for News Ltd papers in Sydney, Perth, London and Melbourne before travelling through SE Asia in the late 90s. He was a senior editor at The Nation for 17+ years.


AF China Bond