fbpx

Type to search

Rules on ESG, Sustainable Business Seen Getting Tougher

Companies are likely to face stronger rules and scrutiny in 2023 in regard to environmental policies, to ensure they have ‘climate-friendly’ supply chains and investment policies


Companies are likely to face tougher rules and scrutiny in 2023 in regard to ESG policies and 'climate-friendly' supply chains and investment policies
Residents wade through floodwaters in Zhengzhou, Henan province, China on July 20, 2021. As the focus on climate change intensifies companies in Asia will be forced to 'go green' or lose business, analysts say. Photo: China Daily/China Out via Reuters.

 

Regulators in countries around the world are expected to extend a growing crackdown on fraudulent claims in regard to companies’  climate-friendly status and investment policies in 2023.

This year was the busiest ever for rule-making on environmental, social and governance (ESG) and sustainability policies and that focus is expected to get even more intense in the year ahead.

From Canada to South Africa, the proposed or implemented rules covered everything from driving transparency in corporate supply chains to defining what an environmentally friendly activity even looks like.

Among the most prolific rule-makers was the European Union, which began to roll out sustainability rules for asset managers as part of a series of dictates aimed at ensuring the bloc hits its climate targets and helps rein in global warming.

Regulatory scrutiny also broadened to include investment ratings and the labeling of sustainable investment funds.

Asian nations generally lag in this area, but will be forced to follow suit given the risk of adverse trade impacts that could follow news or exposure of weak ESG standards or oversight.

Countries that continue to develop coal power plants, such as China, or fail to protect significant forest areas, such as Myanmar, could face trade repercussions in coming years, analysts have said, given the increasing focus on countering the adverse impacts of global warming.

ALSO SEE:

Western Firms Race to Set up Green Hydrogen in Asia – Nikkei

 

 

‘Greenwashing’

Increased regulatory worries about ‘greenwashing’, or inflated climate-friendly claims, come as trillions of dollars flow into companies and investments touting their ESG credentials.

With so much money being bet on companies doing well on ESG, and with a need to ensure laggards are held to account so the world can hit its climate and broader sustainability goals, regulators are making a push for clearer market guard rails.

Without them, it has traditionally been hard to punish bad practice, although 2022 saw that begin to change. In the United States, for example, both Goldman Sachs Asset Management and BNY Mellon Investment Adviser were fined over ESG failures.

German asset manager DWS, meanwhile, saw its offices raided and its chief executive step down after allegations that it misled investors about its ESG investments.

With tougher rules, companies and financial firms will be forced to adopt higher standards and be more transparent over their ESG efforts, for fear of censure, be it public, regulatory or even legal.

Among companies to face legal or regulatory challenge over the last year were miner Glencore, the Dutch subsidiary of Air France KLM and the directors of energy company Shell.

Question marks over a company’s ESG credentials are also starting to draw the attention of activist investors, keen to leverage the wall of ESG money in the market to affect boardroom change.

 

Sustainability Standards

During 2022 the European Union, United States and the new, global International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) set out climate-related disclosure rules for companies to be finalised in 2023, meaning corporations can no longer hide behind an unregulated patchwork of voluntary norms.

ESG rules will also fast become mandatory rather than optional in 2023 – with the EU expected to push out 200 pages of guidance in January alone to help market participants use its green taxonomy, a list of environmentally friendly activities, and other ESG rules.

With so many rules popping up, a key task of regulators globally will be how they all sync together, making it easier for businesses to manage and ensuring bad practice in one area is not displaced to another.

The work of ISSB will also be key in pushing forward a global baseline for the climate-related information shared by companies with investors, making it easier to compare corporate efforts across the world.

However, this is only likely to happen in stages from 2023 given there are no global taxonomies or rules on what constitute sustainable investments.

 

  • Reuters with additional editing by Jim Pollard

 

 

ALSO SEE:

Solar Panels Mandatory in New Tokyo Homes Built After 2025

 

West Forms Green Alliance Against China For Key EV Minerals

 

G7 Upgrade $15bn Coal Transition Deal Offer to Vietnam

 

Global Energy Crisis Driving Faster Shift to Renewables: IEA’s Birol

 

South Asia in Climate Spotlight in Wake of Brutal Heatwave

 

 

Jim Pollard

Jim Pollard is an Australian journalist based in Thailand since 1999. He worked for News Ltd papers in Sydney, Perth, London and Melbourne before travelling through SE Asia in the late 90s. He was a senior editor at The Nation for 17+ years and has a family in Bangkok.

logo

AF China Bond