'Conflicted' Intel CEO Must Resign Over China Ties, Trump Says

Intel has been hit by a new and potentially serious blow, with US President Donald Trump demanding the immediate resignation of its new CEO Lip-Bu Tan.

The call by Trump, who described Tan as “highly conflicted” – due to his ties to Chinese firms – and raised doubts about plans to turn around the struggling American chip icon.

The president’s remarks appear to be based on a disclosure by Reuters in April that Tan had invested at least $200 million in hundreds of Chinese advanced manufacturing and chip firms, some of which were linked to the Chinese military.

ALSO SEE: Surge of Chinese Exports to Southeast Asia as Cargo to US Falls

Trump’s comments came a day after Reuters also reported that Republican Senator Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel’s board chair with questions about Tan’s ties to Chinese firms and a recent criminal case involving his former firm Cadence Design.

“The CEO of INTEL is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem,” Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform.

Not surprisingly, Intel shares closed down 3% on Thursday.

A leadership change could pile pressure on Intel, which is a pillar of US efforts to boost domestic chipmaking. Last year, it secured $8 billion in subsidies, the largest outlay under the 2022 CHIPS Act, to build new factories in Ohio and other states.

Intel ‘engaging with Washington’

Yesterday Tan said he shared the president’s commitment to advancing US national and economic security.

Intel’s board was “fully supportive” of the company’s work to transform its business and ramp up advanced chip manufacturing later this year, Tan added in a statement posted on the company’s website.

“My reputation has been built on trust – on doing what I say I’ll do, and doing it the right way… this is the same way I am leading Intel,” he said. “We are engaging with the Administration to address the matters that have been raised and ensure they have the facts.”

Trump’s intervention marked a rare instance of a US president publicly calling for a CEO’s ouster and sparked debate among investors.

“It would be setting a very unfortunate precedent. You don’t want American presidents dictating who runs companies, but certainly his opinion has merit and weight,” Phil Blancato, CEO of Ladenburg Thalmann Asset Management, said.

David Wagner, head of equity and portfolio manager at Intel shareholder Aptus Capital Advisors, said while “many investors likely believe that President Trump has his hand in too many cookie jars, it’s just another signal that he’s very serious about trying to bring business back to the US.”

Intel said it was making significant investments aligned with Trump’s America First agenda.

“We look forward to our continued engagement with the Administration,” the company said in its statement on Thursday.

Investments in PLA suppliers ‘divested’

Reuters reported in April that Tan himself, and through venture funds he had founded or operates, invested in Chinese firms, including contractors and suppliers for the People’s Liberation Army between March 2012 and December 2024.

The reporting was based on a review of Chinese corporate databases cross-referenced with US and analyst lists of firms with connections to the Chinese military.

A source familiar with the matter had at the time told Reuters that Tan had divested his positions in entities in China, without providing further details.

Chinese databases reviewed by Reuters at the time had listed many of his investments as current, and Reuters was at the time unable to establish the extent of his divestitures.

Cadence scandal

Tan, a Malaysian-born Chinese American business executive, was the CEO of Cadence Design from 2008 through December 2021, during which the chip design software maker sold products to a Chinese military university believed to be involved in simulating nuclear explosions.

Cadence last month agreed to plead guilty and pay more than $140 million to resolve the US charges over the sales, as Reuters noted.

“We don’t believe Lip-Bu is ‘conflicted,’ though given the nature of this administration, the China ties are seemingly creating an increasingly bad look,” Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon said.

“And unfortunately, unlike other tech CEOs Lip-Bu does not appear to have cultivated the kind of personal relationship with Trump that would help to assuage his ire.”

A White House official said: “President Trump remains fully committed to safeguarding our country’s national and economic security. This includes ensuring iconic American companies in cutting-edge sectors are led by men and women who Americans can trust.”

Gelsinger fired

Once the bedrock of Silicon Valley’s global dominance in chips, Intel in recent years lost its manufacturing edge to Taiwanese rival TSMC.

It also has virtually no presence in the booming market for artificial intelligence chips dominated by Nvidia and has been losing market share in data centres and personal computers – long its stronghold – to rival AMD.

Late last year, the company fired its then CEO Pat Gelsinger well before the completion of his four-year roadmap to restore Intel’s lead in making the fastest and smallest computer chips.

The ousting followed a Reuters special report in October that Intel had failed to live up to the lofty ambitions Gelsinger had set for manufacturing and AI capabilities.

To revive Intel’s fortunes, the board named former board member Tan as CEO, betting on his deep roots in the chip industry and track record as a longtime investor in promising tech startups.

Tan has largely abandoned his predecessor’s strategy, aggressively shrinking the company’s workforce and putting on hold planned manufacturing plants globally.

The production process that Intel hoped would pave the way to winning manufacturing deals and restore its edge in churning out high-end, high-margin chips is also facing a big hurdle on quality as it puts newer technologies to the test, Reuters reported earlier this month.

Intel has also further slowed the pace of construction of a factory in Ohio, now expected to be completed around 2030 or 2031.