fbpx

Type to search

US Lawmakers Push Location-Tracking For High Powered AI Chips

Lawmaker says technology to track chips is readily available, while there is bipartisan support for requiring companies like Nvidia to build location-tracking into their high-powered AI chips


Nvidia logo
Nvidia, the most valuable US chipmaker, found itself in the crosshairs of the US-China chip war late last year, when US officials asked the company to stop exporting its two top computing chips for AI work to China. Photo: Reuters

 

Lawmakers in the US have backed a proposed bill that they hope can counter the smuggling of high-powered artificial intelligence chips such as those made by Nvidia.

The move, which has bipartisan support, is based on technology that already exists to track and verify the location of AI chips after they are sold. It seeks to address reports of widespread smuggling of Nvidia’s chips into China in violation of US export control laws.

Nvidia’s chips are a critical ingredient for creating AI systems such as chatbots, image generators and more specialized ones that can help craft biological weapons. Both President Donald Trump and his predecessor, Joe Biden, have implemented progressively tighter export controls to prevent China and its military getting the US tech giant’s most advanced chips.

 

ALSO SEE: Asian Currencies Soar as Investors Dump The US Dollar

 

Reuters and other news organizations have documented how some of those chips have continued to flow into China, and Nvidia has publicly claimed it cannot track its products after they are sold.

But US Representative Bill Foster, a Democrat from Illinois who once worked as a particle physicist, said the technology to track chips after they are sold is readily available, with much of it already built in to Nvidia’s chips. Independent technical experts interviewed by Reuters agreed.

Foster, who successfully designed multiple computer chips during his scientific career, plans to introduce a bill in coming weeks  that would direct US regulators to come up with rules in two key areas: Tracking chips to ensure they are where they are authorized to be under export control licences, and preventing those chips from booting up if they are not properly licensed under export controls.

 

‘Large-scale chip smuggling’

Foster told Reuters that there are already credible reports – some of which have not been publicly disclosed – of chip smuggling occurring on a large scale.

“This is not an imaginary future problem,” Foster said. “It is a problem now, and at some point we’re going to discover that the Chinese Communist Party, or their military, is busy designing weapons using large arrays of chips, or even just working on (artificial general intelligence), which is as immediate as nuclear technology.”

Nvidia declined to comment for this story.

Chip smuggling has taken on new urgency after the emergency of China’s DeepSeek, whose AI systems posed a strong challenge to US systems and were built with Nvidia chips that were prohibited for sale to China, according to analyst firm SemiAnalysis.

The House Select Committee on China said last month that DeepSeek was “reportedly developed using over 60,000 Nvidia chips, which may have been obtained in circumvention of US export controls.”

It released a report entitled ‘DeepSeek Unmasked’, which accuses the company of being the Chinese Communist Party’s “latest tool for spying, stealing and subverting US export control restrictions.”

 

Chinese trio charged in Singapore

Meanwhile, prosecutors in Singapore have charged three Chinese nationals with fraud in a case that involved servers that may have contained Nvidia chips.

Though it has not been put into broad use, the technology to verify the location of chips already exists. Alphabet’s Google already tracks the location of its in-house AI chips and others in its vast network of data centres for security purposes, according to two sources with direct knowledge of its operations.

Google did not respond to a request for comment.

Foster’s legislation would give the US Department of Commerce six months to come up with regulations to require the technology.

 

Lawmakers back on-chip location tracking

Foster’s bill has support from fellow Democrats such as Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi, the ranking member on the House Select Committee on China. “On-chip location verification is one creative solution we should explore to stop this smuggling,” Krishnamoorthi said in a statement.

Republicans are also supportive, with Representative John Moolenaar, who chairs the committee, said: “The Select Committee has strong bipartisan support for requiring companies like Nvidia to build location-tracking into their high-powered AI chips — and the technology to do it already exists.”

The technology for verifying the location of chips would rely on the chips communicating with a secured computer server that would use the length of time it takes for the signal to reach the server to verify where chips are, a concept that relies on knowing that computer signals move at the speed of light.

Tim Fist, a former engineer and director of emerging technology policy at Washington think tank Institute for Progress, said such tracking would provide a general, country-level location for chips. But that is far more information than the Bureau of Industry and Security, the arm of the US Commerce Department responsible for enforcement of export controls, currently has.

“BIS has no idea which chips they should be targeting as a potential high priority to investigate once they’ve gone overseas,” Fist said. With location verification, “they now at least have bucketed the set of chips that are out there in the world into ones that are very likely to not have been smuggled and ones that warrant further investigation.”

Foster’s second legislative goal of preventing AI chips from booting up if they are not properly licensed under US export controls would be more technologically complex to implement than location verification, but he said the time has come to begin discussions for both efforts.

“We’ve gotten enough input that I think now we can have more detailed discussions with the actual chip and module providers to say, ‘How would you actually implement this?'” Foster said.

 

  • Reuters with additional input and editing by Jim Pollard

 

ALSO SEE:

Nvidia and China Tech Giants Hit by Latest US Chip Clampdown

Tariffs on Imported Chips to be Announced Soon, Trump Says

China Tech Giants ‘Ordered $16 Billion of New Nvidia Chips’

Server Fraud Case in Singapore May be Linked to AI Chips, China

China Tech Giants Lift Nvidia Chip Orders Amid Trump Curbs Talk

All Eyes on Nvidia Chips Demand Amid Doubts on AI Outlays

DeepSeek Breakthrough or Theft? US Probes ‘AI Data Breach’

‘AI Breakthrough’ by China’s DeepSeek Rocks US Tech Giants

Bytedance ‘Plans $20 Billion Outlay on AI Infrastructure This Year’

Biden Restricts Access to AI Chips to US Firms And Its Allies

China’s Huawei ‘Hoping Its New AI Chip Can Outpower Nvidia’

 

Jim Pollard

Jim Pollard is an Australian journalist based in Thailand since 1999. He worked for News Ltd papers in Sydney, Perth, London and Melbourne before travelling through SE Asia in the late 90s. He was a senior editor at The Nation for 17+ years.