Thousands of artists beaver away every day creating images to sell as digital tokens (NFTs) in online exchanges.
The market is booming, the most popular pieces can sell for millions, while outsiders may wonder why anyone would pay anything at all.
But artists like Malaysia’s mumu_thestan says it is a varied landscape. “You can’t treat the whole NFT community as one,” she says in a telephone interview.
Mumu, a 33-year-old illustrator who declined to give her real name, labours over her creations, from constellations of flashing pixels to lush fantasy-style images of women and dragons, selling them for a few hundred US dollars apiece.
She made a special animated tiger for the lunar new year.
Mumu, with a detail of her art shown at left, has worked to create a niche, refusing to sell on the main exchanges because of their use of the energy-hungry ethereum blockchain.
“The mainstream audience thinks NFTs are about selling a jpeg for millions or making a monkey picture,” she said. “That’s not all it is.”
Artist David Leonard collects works by artists like Mumu because he believes she does great work and deserves the support of a community.
“As an artist, I want to be the kind of collector that I wish I had… I wouldn’t want my collector base to be thinking about their bottom line,” he said.
Piece of Computer Code
No physical pieces of art exchange hands in these transactions. Buyers use cryptocurrencies and receive their NFTs – a unique piece of computer code related to the artwork that is stored on a blockchain, a kind of digital ledger that cannot be changed.
Fans have an almost cultish devotion and see the technological complexity as an inherent part of the value.
Driven by high-profile auctions, the market for NFTs exploded in 2021 with sales worth more than $40 billion, according to analytics firm Chainalysis.
Any sense that last year’s prices could not be sustained in 2022 has already been dispelled – to take one example, popstar Justin Bieber paid more than $1.3 million last week for an NFT from the collection known as “Bored Apes Yacht Club”.
The collection, which features 10,000 cartoon images of apes with algorithm-generated variations to the background and other details, enjoyed a record January, shifting dozens of NFTs each day for an average price of roughly $250,000.
Critics say pure profit motivates the big transactions, with major financial players using technospeak and celebrity endorsements to disguise their aims.
Yet one of the main narratives around NFTs is one of the speculators making crushing profits by flipping their assets. Booms and bubbles are fuelled by social-media hype and celebrity endorsements.
Last year, the must-have collection was CryptoPunks – blocky images of 1970s style punks. Some sold for millions, with owners including Jay-Z, Snoop Dogg and YouTuber Logan Paul.
Now it is Bored Apes – Bieber posted his ape image to his 200 million Instagram followers, giving powerful promotion to a collection already hyped by the likes of tennis star Serena Williams.
Artists ‘Losing Money’
Most NFT creators can only dream of that kind of publicity. “The average artist is actually losing money on their NFTs,” says software developer Stephen Diehl, a vocal critic of cryptocurrencies.
He says the small players who make single editions of an original artwork generally pay out any profit in fees and costs – and that is the lucky few who sell anything at all.
Mumu acknowledges a debt of gratitude to her own celebrity endorsement – Mike Shinoda of US rock group Linkin Park is a fan.
But the rest has been hard work – building enough of a following through her art and activism so that she can afford to do NFTs full time.
She has 13,000 followers on Twitter compared with the 600,000 who follow Bored Apes.
This community-building has obvious parallels with the traditional art market where young artists often work as hard on garnering a following as they do on their work.
Esteemed auction house Christie’s has helped cement this connection, selling an NFT by American artist Beeple for $69 million last year, making him the world’s third-most expensive living artist.
The buyer could have bagged a Van Gogh or a Monet, works by both going under the hammer for similar money last year.
- AFP, with additional editing by George Russell